There has been a ton of ink spilled over the absurdity of the NBA Lockout, the aborted lawsuits by the players, and now the Chris Paul trade debacle. It’s hard to think of anything that I haven’t already read elsewhere. But one conspiracy theory I’ve yet to see is the suggestion that David Stern was negotiating only in order to save face. The Lakers-Hornets-Rockets trade that Stern vetoed was probably the best the Hornets could get, not great for the Hornets, but considering they have little leverage, getting back 4 starters and a pick was extraordinary. GM Del Demps was rightfully lauded, and then completely kneecapped.
So, last I read, the Hornets (i.e. David Stern) demanded four players (a solid center, a rising star shooting guard, and two up-coming prospects) and 2 picks from the Clippers. This was far too steep for the Clippers, and to me seems completely unreasonable, but if the Hornets were able to pull down a better deal than what the Lakers and Rockets were offering, then his rejection of the trade would not seem so heavy-handed and unfair.
Of course, if there is no trade for Chris Paul, which by all accounts will be because the NBA (be it David Stern, the team owners, or some potential buyer of the Hornets) is asking too high a price and too stubborn. At this point, I cannot conceive of any team being able to reach an agreement with the Hornets, given the demands made of the Clippers. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Hornets are unable to trade CP3 at all this season, and they end up losing him to free agency at the end of the 66-game season, and getting nothing in return.I also doubt CP3 will play hard this season, because why the hell should he risk injury or too much wear on his knees for a team and league that seems determined to martyr him for the sake of “competitive balance” by which they mean their “bottom line”. The sad part is, the other owners are devaluing thier own asset in the Hornets through this embarrassment of cannibalism.
Then again, I thought that there wouldn’t be a season at all and am thoroughly surprised the NBA is playing any games this year. So maybe the NBA will work something out but they will not get over the impression that they are running a conspiracy to show the players that they are mere chattel while screwing over big-market teams through unfair bullying instead of competing on the court. When the current CBA can be opted out of in 6 years, expect another lockout and/or strike, because the owners were unhappy with the deal they signed as evidenced by their complaining about the CP3 trade, and the players may not have signed the CBA at all if they knew they would be disrespected in this manner.
Through all of this, keep in mind that Chris Paul may have a labor complaint to file against the NBA. I doubt a lawsuit could be filed, or would be successful, although the difference between a 4-year free agency contract and a 5-year extension contract might be a legally cognizable economic injury. Regardless, these actions on the part of the NBA and David Stern will be an interesting piece of evidence in the antitrust case the NBA Players will likely file 6 years from now.
Who knew that NOLA meant “NO LA” for Chris Paul. Yes, the NBA, where a train wreck happens.